mandag 8. desember 2003

Michael Jackson Needs A New Fix

I told you I was going to write about Michael Jackson again. So lets see.

It didn't shock me that he was put under investigation for pedophilia once again. The documentary where he speaks openly about the natural phenomenon; holding hands and sharing bed with children (it seems especially young boys) was shocking to me. If Michael's dear friend Liz Taylor saw this documentary and found his behaviour to be healthy and normal, I'd say that she's most likely gone completely senile.

You have maybe seen the documentary. However I like to say a few words about it. First of all, because it's probably one of the best documented proof of that money and fame can truly mutate a person into something sad and horrid.

At one part of the documentary he was sitting in his emty cinema looking at old clips of himself as a child performer. He used to be this cute, innocent looking boy singing love songs for adults. Smiling and twisting around to the cheers of the crowds. Who wouldn't fall for that? Who wouldn't want to bet money on him? I used to think he had a special charm and I tried to see if it was still there in the old him. It's difficult to say when he has become the warning sign that every inspiring artist two blocks from Hollywood or Neverland should be subjected to. They should get a free close look at Michael Jackson's face. Free and close. Then read a banner that says; This is what you might turn out as if you freak out in showbusiness. When the freak syndrome hits you, you should pack your bags and go live out in a secluded cabin in the mountains. Drink tea. Let ironing become one of your many household hobbies. Start to talk with the animals and plants. Stay away from private hospitals. Stir away from drugs, even those your doctor gave you. Become a vegetarian. Study. Do yoga and turn into a healthy freak that will mock the old you.

Michael Jackson says that he have only had one or two fixes on his nose. Nothing else. His white skin has to do with a skin disease. Isn't it funny how not only his skin turned more white than a white person's skin, but his face started to look more and more like a white person's facial proportions. It's fair to say that Michael have done a lot of fixes on his face and that he feel embarrassed about it. He probably thinks it's okay to lie about, it's nobodies business. The entertainment industry says; "Smile, lie and get fake!" Isn't that what it's all about, or is it something I dont get?

Did you know that the real meaning of the song "Black Or White" is "It doesn't matter if you are black, but look like you are white."

Many of the rich and famous have obviously lived too much in the spotlight, to understand that normal people are averagely not so easily fooled. Besides we love gossip, whether it is about the neighbour or the queen. Maybe Michael Jackson thinks in his deluded little world of money, that no one is going to think that it's kind of sad, seing a lonely alien pointing his finger at foul and glaring decorative objects, that he will buy for billions and put in his lonely sircus. Well, I guess he haven't always been lonely. The animals and the children likes him.

When I saw the documentary I noted myself that he lied on at least three occasions. He first of all must have lied when it comes to his face operations. Maybe some would call it a mild lie, it was after all something he did to himself and many people in the entertainment industry would probably understand his lie and support it even. A lot of other people would say it doesn't matter. It's his talent that is important, not his looks. Fair enough. The other lie is more serious. He first claimed that he had, or used to have a relationship with the mother of his last child, but that she wished to stay out of the media, which would be understandable of course. It sounded fine, until he later on said that he had never even met the mother of his last child. The child was just ordered and bought. His wish was that the child came from an intelligent female, as Michael thought that was very important. The third time he lied, was when he suddenly claimed that his new white baby was delivered by a black woman. As you may have seen, all his children look very much white. When the interviewer asked if it would be okay for him to have a black child, you could see in his face that he just came up with a new story as he went along. -"The mother was black." -he said. In that moment he reminded me of an old friend of mine who lied about everything she said. Every time she lied, she wouldn't focus her eyes and she would make her voice a little bit sweeter. Then she would say; -"It's true, it's really true..." and maybe she would turn up a serious looking face or giggle. Never looking you in the eye. You know the person if you have met one. They lie to themselves even more. And they wish to stay in their little world of mimic. And you feel sorry for them because their lies are never convincing and because they never seem really happy. It's all a cover up. Michael reminded me of this type of person. It was when he finally brought all doubts aside about being out of his mind. No one would ever believe that a snow white baby would come out of a black mother. Not that it would be wrong if it was possible, but in my idea it would a wrong thing to lie about.

The documentary was made over several months I believe and it had been cut and glued together as the makers saw fit. Michael might have forgot what he had said on certain times and because of that made lies that were very easy to discover when the clips were put together. It was a surprise though. You'd think that a guy who have been interviewed and filmed for the public eye since childhood, would be better at portraying himself. In my view, I saw this man who came off as the most ridiculous, immature person they could ever dig up to be making a documentary about. It's just strange that no one i his near presence, people that cared about him, family or something, didn't tell him to stay away from interviews and documentaries. The fact that he existed in the documentary, giggling as he held the young boy's hand, made him seem even more lonely and confused than he would seem, if he didn't do the documentary. A person with some tiny bit of intellect, whether it was a pedophile or not, would have stayed out of such behaviour in front of a camera.

But as they say; pedophiles often doesn't understand that they are doing something wrong, they see it as something innocent, because it's in their sexuality. And talking about pedophiles. We know that Michael Jackson seem, sounds like one and has the right background. Psychology says that you are not born a pedophile, it is created. Trough abuse. If a child has to behave like adult in their childhood, they will sometimes become sexually immature. Meaning they will stagnate at a certain age and will continue having a sexuality that fits with that age or level. This means that they will enjoy the company of children instead of adults, when they are no longer a child. Michael Jackson had a job when he were a child and he wasn't allowed to play with other children. He had to grow up fast and he probably never really grew up.

Sometimes he would talk about some of his strange behaviour. Probably a little bit unaware of how crazy it really sounded. I can't remember if it was the same documentary, but Liz Taylor and him was celebrating Christmas together. She had decorated his house when he was asleep. Christmas tree, lightings, ornaments, huge figurines, presents, all that stuff. Later on he said he went into the bathroom and cried to himself, because he felt guilty about celebrating Christmas. His family were Yohova Witnesses and they were not suppose to celebrate Christmas. I'd say that it's slightly strange for an adult person to feel so guilty about doing something so innocent. It makes you think that he probably feel guilty about a whole lot of other things too. His father once said that the family didn't approve of gay people. A parent that likes to speak on behalf of it's adult children, have most likely made them immature when it comes to being honest. You would want to hide things in yourself, if you had a dad like that.

Anyhow, Michael Jackson made great music, cool videos. He also had a charm that few other musicians could come up with. I wonder how attractive and talented he would have been today, if he didn't mess himself up the way he did. He have sort of fed the stupid and poor with the idea of him as the icon of goodness. In a way it loses the musical touch. The rawness of it. And the new becomes something old. People start to worship and it all turns into a circus. In the end it's not so much the media's fault. A lot of people like Michael Jackson and Madonna have stated that they hate the tabloids. But the tabloids are a result of how people behave. A lot of great musicians have not lived by the tabloids. Michael Jackson and Madonna seems to have only really lived in the tabloids. It's hard to believe that they have actually had a life outside of it. Many of those people are maybe like alcoholics, fame became a drug.

I have to say that Michael Jackson didn't sound too sharp in the higher compartments. For example he said he never wanted to die and he said so in a serious tone. He spoke more about how important it is for the child to be intellectual, than what it means to feel safe and loved. A few years ago here in Norway, a young black guy was killed by nazis. I guess this is a sad thing that happens in a lot of countries. Michael had a young boyfriend here in Norway, one of those that used to live with him. This boyfriend called Michael to tell him about the sad event and Michael was apparently shocked; he didn't know that there actually were nazis in Norway. Ah, maybe you should get out of Neverland more often Michael?

The young boy from Norway is now no longer a child. I remember I saw him not too long ago, on tv. First I thought it was Michael Jackson himself. It was a bit shocking. I have a memory of the boy as a cute light chocolate coloured boy. He dressed like Michael and held his little white glove hand in Michael's glove hand. Today he is white and there's obviously been a few fixes on him as well. I assume Michael is bored of him when the boy was no longer a child. Well, at least he will always remember Michael just by looking himself in the mirror.

Why would any parent let their children live in the house of a stranger? This boy from Norway was taken away from school, friends and home to live with Michael. Why? His family got a large house as a gift from Michael, even though they were not poor people. If someone offered me a free house I'd think of it as suspicious, it wouldn't make sense. Because I dont need a house for free, I can get myself a job and save up for one. If not a house, I can at least get a descent apartment. Most people can, it's something else when it comes to homeless people. If I was a parent and someone asked me if my child could come live with them, I would release a bit of ager and see it as an offence. If these people were normal people, I would say that they saw something strange in it. But maybe the money were too tempting. They would weigh their children and their love for the material in their minds. Decide that they were somehow specially elected, by a special rich guy. They would probably not even care, if they made things more difficult for Michael in the long run.

What I detest the most about this is; one of the boys he had living with him had a poor family. The boy was suffering from cancer. Michael had the boy living with him, as he paid for the medications. I believe the family also got a new house. In the documentary you see Michael with this boy, while someone expresses that the boy suddenly became better when he met Michael. The cancer went away. They said it in a way that made it look like Michael had healed the boy, just by being near him. If I remember correctly, it was the same boy he held hands with and talked about sharing a bedroom with. It's the same boy that allegedly later on, claimed he had been abused by Michael.

It's natural to think that he could easily fool the children, making them think he is some kind of mix between Santa and Jesus. If I was an adult in the presence of that scene, I would give Michael a lesson he wouldn't forget. Ever.

Would an average guy suspected for pedophilia have other peoples children living with him? No. The privilege Michael has is that he's got enough money to buy people. He bough himself white little babies. He bough himself dark pretty young boys for playmates. And worst of all; he bough the adults that should have been there to protect these children.

Another thing, they made a documentary about the nurse Debbie Rowe, that gave Michael some white babies. It was supposed to paint a good picture of Michael and herself. To no good effect. Apperantly he gave her millions to stay away from her kids. She said that Michael needed to be a father. If Jesus was walking on two legs today, I'm sure a lot of females with a cuckoo flying around in their head, would state the same thing. Happiness to them would be to serve the master. Self-sacrificing and dumb. And not really knowing what true kindness is all about. Lets not get into all the nonsense she said. It's not worth quoting.

No one needs to be a parent.
But a child needs a good parent.

Adoption is a good thing though, no doubt about that. I also support it for gay people. It's something else to make a business out of sperm, eggs and children that are not already created. It's not right that you can buy yourself a child from a catalog. Pick them after colour, intellect and status. It's repulsive. It's sad. And if anything at all is wrong in this world, it's that.

If put up for trial, would Michael go to jail? Sooner or later. In my opinion, if I should guess, he will most likely do an O.J. Simpson; just get away with it.

Talking about strange famous people. I always thought it would be a little amusing, if one of the white tigers to Siegfried & Roy, would try to eat them. Well, in the honeyed days of Michael Jackson gossip, it almost happened.